Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
F
fluiddyn_papers
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
fluiddyn
fluiddyn_papers
Commits
be71968d
Commit
be71968d
authored
4 years ago
by
Pierre Augier
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Shorter opening paragraph
parent
9503b1bf
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!5
First modifications to take care of the editor remarks
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
reply_Zwart2020/correspondence.md
+8
-8
8 additions, 8 deletions
reply_Zwart2020/correspondence.md
reply_Zwart2020/reply_editor_NA.md
+8
-8
8 additions, 8 deletions
reply_Zwart2020/reply_editor_NA.md
with
16 additions
and
16 deletions
reply_Zwart2020/correspondence.md
+
8
−
8
View file @
be71968d
...
...
@@ -34,14 +34,14 @@
\v
space{1cm}
Zwart recently published in Nature Astronomy a commen
t on
**
The ecological
impact of
high-performance computing in astrophysics
**
\c
ite{Zwart2020}.
Th
e
take-home message
is that
scientists should be mindfull of their carbon
footprint
and we fully agree
. One of the proposed solution is to avoid the
Python programming
language. We advocate that it would be counterproductive and
that scientific
programs written in Python can be efficient and energy
friendly. We argue that
advancement of compiler technology, human factors and
education are much more
important than choice of language.
We read with attention the comment by Zwar
t on
**
The ecological
impact of
high-performance computing in astrophysics
**
\c
ite{Zwart2020}.
We fully agre
e
with its
take-home message
:
scientists should be mindfull of their carbon
footprint. One of the proposed solution is to avoid the
Python programming
language. We advocate that it would be counterproductive and
that scientific
programs written in Python can be efficient and energy
friendly. We argue that
advancement of compiler technology, human factors and
education are much more
important than choice of language.
To support his idea, Zwart presents a benchmark of the N-Body problem with an
inefficient implementation in Python, running 50 times slower than a C++
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
reply_Zwart2020/reply_editor_NA.md
+
8
−
8
View file @
be71968d
...
...
@@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
Figures 1 and 3, all along section 3 "The role of language on the ecology" and
in the conclusions. We rewrote the first paragraph which is now:
"
Zwart recently published in Nature Astronomy a commen
t on The ecological
impact of
high-performance computing in astrophysics
\c
ite{Zwart2020}.
Th
e
take-home message
is that
scientists should be mindfull of their carbon
footprint
and we fully agree
. One of the proposed solution is to avoid the
Python programming
language. We advocate that it would be counterproductive and
that scientific
programs written in Python can be efficient and energy
friendly. We argue that
advancement of compiler technology, human factors and
education are much more
important than choice of language."
"
We read with attention the comment by Zwar
t on
**
The ecological
impact of
high-performance computing in astrophysics
**
\c
ite{Zwart2020}.
We fully agre
e
with its
take-home message
:
scientists should be mindfull of their carbon
footprint. One of the proposed solution is to avoid the
Python programming
language. We advocate that it would be counterproductive and
that scientific
programs written in Python can be efficient and energy
friendly. We argue that
advancement of compiler technology, human factors and
education are much more
important than choice of language."
Regarding the length of our text, we tried to reduce it by rewording and
cutting unnecessary words. You suggested to remove the first half of the
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment