Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
thg
thg
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 798
    • Issues 798
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

There will be about 1h of downtime on 2020-03-02 at 13:00 UTC+1 (change of servers and upgrade to Heptapod 0.20.0 final)

  • mercurial
  • TortoiseHg
  • thgthg
  • Issues
  • #5534

Closed
Open
Opened Apr 16, 2020 by Bitbucket Importer@bitbucket_importerOwner

Performance Regression with grafting

Created originally on Bitbucket by Anonymous

In comparison to TortoiseHG 5.0.2 grafting several changesets at once in a large repository is significantly slower with Tortoise 5.3.2 (same with 5.3.1). OS is Windows 10. Whereas with 5.0.2 each graft takes less than 5 seconds, it took at least 30 seconds with 5.3.2. Unfortunately I can't give you more details since I can only run tests on my PC in the office an I'm currently working from home.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: mercurial/tortoisehg/thg#5534