# HG changeset patch
# User Armin Rigo <arigo@tunes.org>
# Date 1365334506 -7200
#      Sun Apr 07 13:35:06 2013 +0200
# Branch extradoc
# Node ID 530358f34f23ae11b14bd82bf991531701a16260
# Parent  403e29079441fe73ba6b62f0d890d410906eefe6
Typo (thanks tshepang)

diff --git a/performance.html b/performance.html
--- a/performance.html
+++ b/performance.html
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@
 <h2>Old- vs. new-style classes</h2>
 <p>New-style classes allow faster attribute access and take up less core
 per instance than old-style classes.  Much of this advantage may be
-lostm, however, if attribute names are not constant. For example: x.a
+lost, however, if attribute names are not constant. For example: x.a
 = y or even setattr(x, &lsquo;a&rsquo;, y) will be much faster than a dynamic
 version: setattr(x, &lsquo;a&rsquo; + some_variable, y).</p>
 <p>Classes that inherit from both new- and old-style classes are
diff --git a/source/performance.txt b/source/performance.txt
--- a/source/performance.txt
+++ b/source/performance.txt
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
 
 New-style classes allow faster attribute access and take up less core
 per instance than old-style classes.  Much of this advantage may be
-lostm, however, if attribute names are not constant. For example: x.a
+lost, however, if attribute names are not constant. For example: x.a
 = y or even setattr(x, 'a', y) will be much faster than a dynamic
 version: setattr(x, 'a' + some_variable, y).