Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • pypy pypy
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 675
    • Issues 675
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 13
    • Merge requests 13
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

April 05-07 - Mercurial Paris Conference 2023 - One day of workshop dedicated to Heptapod and Mercurial usage and workflow. There are still places available for both workshops and talks!

  • PyPyPyPy
  • pypypypy
  • Merge requests
  • !270

py3.3: fixes for failing hashlib tests

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Bitbucket Importer requested to merge bitbucket/merged-pr-270 into branch/py3.3 Aug 17, 2014
  • Overview 4
  • Commits 6
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 7

Created originally on Bitbucket by numerodix (Martin Matusiak)

Was already merged in Bitbucket before import, marked as merged by the import user

This PR is bigger than normal but you get 10 passing tests :)

I also think it would be a good idea to add some more tests to test_sha_extra.py for _sha256 and _sha512, as they currently only have this new check for .name. The modules _sha256 and _sha512 have some test code in "if name == main" style that I'm pretty sure is not being picked up by py.test. But since there are already quite a few changes here I figured I'd ask you first, @pjenvey. If you're inclined I'll add that to the PR.

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: bitbucket/merged-pr-270