The changes introduced by 91a34a0db5d2 do not result the failing tests (see http://buildbot.pypy.org/summary/longrepr?testname=unmodified&builder=pypy-c-jit-linux-x86-64&build=6808&mod=lib-python.3.test.test_complex), as the warnings are raised at the wrong moment (when calling
complex() on an instance of a subclass of
complex, rather than when
__complex__ returns an instance of a subclass).
I'm not sure if accessing
w_z.imagval for these subclass instances is correct, though?
But while looking into that, I bumped into this (related?) discrepancy between CPython and PyPy:
class complex3(complex): def __new__(self, value=0j): return complex.__new__(self, 2*value) @property def real(self): return 0 @property def imag(self): return 1
>>> complex3(1j) 2j >>> complex(complex3(1j)) 2j
>>>> complex3(1j) 2j >>>> complex(complex3(1j)) 1j
This seems to be because CPython directly accesses the internal C representation (
((PyComplexObject*)r)->cval), while PyPy goes for the
imag fields (