Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b2e61a4f21b4 authored by Pierre Augier's avatar Pierre Augier
Browse files

Bit more review0

parent c23b8c58f198
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!12Topic/default/update strat
......@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
clean:
rm -f tmp/*.tex
cd input && rm -f *.aux *.fdb_latexmk *.fls *.log *.bak* *.bbl *.blg *.out *Notes.bib
cleantmp:
rm -rf tmp/*
......@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@
format:
cd input && formattex *.tex -i -v
black:
black -l 82 py
......@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
all: coverletter.pdf rebut1.pdf rebut2.pdf
%.pdf: input/%.tex
cd input && latexmk -pdf -xelatex -interaction=nonstopmode $(basename $@).tex && rsync $@ ../$@
cd input && latexmk -pdf -halt-on-error $(basename $@).tex && rsync $@ ../$@
format:
cd input && formattex *.tex -i -v
......
......@@ -162,11 +162,11 @@
\Add{Here is a 3D figure showing the toroidal velocity of the dominant vortical mode
\Comment{The figure of the dominant vortical mode is from the simulation at resolution
$n_h = 320$.} \begin{figure}[h] \centering
\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{vt_filter} \end{figure} It makes us remarks that,
$n_h = 320$.} \begin{figure}[h] \centering
\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{vt_filter} \end{figure} It makes us remarks that,
contrary to what we originally sayed, the dominant vortical mode consists of nearly
vertical stacked shear layers with $(k_h, k_z) = (\Delta k_h, 2 \Delta k_z)$. We have
corrected this part. In our opinion, the last figure is not useful enough to be
included in the manuscript. \\ Yet, following reviewer's suggestion, we include
the following figure (now figure 4) showing the buoyancy field for simulations with
$(N,\R_i) = (40,20)$, which are studied in detail in our manuscript: \begin{figure}[h]
......@@ -167,11 +167,11 @@
contrary to what we originally sayed, the dominant vortical mode consists of nearly
vertical stacked shear layers with $(k_h, k_z) = (\Delta k_h, 2 \Delta k_z)$. We have
corrected this part. In our opinion, the last figure is not useful enough to be
included in the manuscript. \\ Yet, following reviewer's suggestion, we include
the following figure (now figure 4) showing the buoyancy field for simulations with
$(N,\R_i) = (40,20)$, which are studied in detail in our manuscript: \begin{figure}[h]
\centering \includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{../../input/figure4} \end{figure}
We also add the following text to describe this figure: ``Figure~4 shows the buoyancy
\centering \includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{../../input/figure4} \end{figure} We
also add the following text to describe this figure: ``Figure~4 shows the buoyancy
fields for these two simulations with the same color scale. We observe that the flow is
layered in the vertical direction and that overturning (horizontal vorticity) is
present with or without vortical modes. It is a standard feature of strongly stratified
......
......@@ -99,14 +99,14 @@
enstrophy \begin{align} V &\equiv \frac{1}{2} \int ~ \Pi^2 ~ \diff x \diff y
\diff z \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \int ~ N^4 \Omega_z^2 ~ \diff x \diff y \diff z +
\int ~ N^2 \Omega_z \bOmega \cdot \bnabla b ~ \diff x \diff y \diff z + \frac{1}{2}
\int ~ \left( \bOmega \cdot \bnabla b \right)^2 ~ \diff x \diff y \diff z \\ &\equiv
V_2 + V_3 + V_4 \end{align} is an invariant of equations (7-9) if no dissipation and no
forcing. For a flow without vertical vorticity $V_2 = V_3 =0$.''. We also give the
relation between vortical modes and vertical vorticity, $\bOmegakz = i \vvt \sin \thk$
in the text. We also refer to the study of \cite{waite_potential_2013} in the
discussion section: ``We observe that \cite{waite_potential_2013} also attained very
small $\R$. In this study, the authors forced vortical modes so their simulations are
not well suited for WWT. Yet, they showed that potential enstrophy tends to be
\int ~ \left( \bOmega \cdot \bnabla b \right)^2 ~ \diff x \diff y \diff z
\\ &\equiv V_2 + V_3 + V_4 \end{align} is an invariant of equations (7-9) if no
dissipation and no forcing. For a flow without vertical vorticity $V_2 = V_3 =0$.''. We
also give the relation between vortical modes and vertical vorticity, $\bOmegakz = i
\vvt \sin \thk$ in the text. We also refer to the study of \cite{waite_potential_2013}
in the discussion section: ``We observe that \cite{waite_potential_2013} also attained
very small $\R$. In this study, the authors forced vortical modes so their simulations
are not well suited for WWT. Yet, they showed that potential enstrophy tends to be
quadradic (i.e. $V \simeq V_2$) for $F_h, \R \ll 1$ and that $V_2 \propto \int ~
\Omega_z^2 ~ \diff x \diff y \diff z$ increases with $\R$ in their simulations. It
suggests that vortical modes energy increases with $\R$ when $\R \lesssim 1$, as
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment