-
- Downloads
rebase: avoid converting from nodes to revnums twice
In the case where the node has successors, but none of them is an ancestor of the destination, we would iterate over the successor nodes twice, check if they're in the repo and convert them to revnums. I doubt it's a measureable cost, but it gets simpler this way too. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3941
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment