- Oct 02, 2018
-
-
Matt Harbison authored
I missed these in 803b7569c9ea because I forgot about `...` lines.
-
Matt Harbison authored
-
Matt Harbison authored
This is needed to keep py3 happy. The other two instances of sorting already did this.
-
Matt Harbison authored
There's still a stacktrace about not being able to serialize _io.TextIOWrapper.
-
- Oct 01, 2018
-
-
Matt Harbison authored
-
- Sep 28, 2018
-
-
Martin von Zweigbergk authored
We had a test that shows that trying to explicitly add a file outside the narrowspec results in an error, but we didn't have a test that shows that paths from subdirectories outside the narrowspec are not added (on e.g. `hg add .`) but silently ignored. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4822
-
- Sep 30, 2018
-
-
Yuya Nishihara authored
I think it's good enough to stabilize the feature, at least for the core and non-experimental commands.
-
Yuya Nishihara authored
-
Yuya Nishihara authored
I think {lineno} looks more like a common template keyword. It isn't called a {line} to avoid conflicts with the element name of {lines} and the {_|splitlines} filter. https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/GenericTemplatingPlan#Dictionary
-
Yuya Nishihara authored
This is a part of the name unification. I think it's somewhat useful to provide a combined view of change/merge statuses. https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/GenericTemplatingPlan#Dictionary
-
- Nov 03, 2017
-
-
Boris Feld authored
We detected that pager is waiting for log-to-process script to finish, which is annoying when adding a script on commandfinish that does an HTTP push. There seems to be no workaround on the script side and it will make the behavior on Linux/MacOS closer to the Windows behavior. The drawback is that it makes the related tests more flaky as log-to-process outputs are now really asynchronous. If it's considered a BC change, another option would be to add a config option for this new behavior. I personally think that the different behavior between Windows and Linux is confusing and that it's a bug I would be fine with a new config option. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4816
-
Boris Feld authored
The next changeset will fix the bad interaction between the pager and log-to- process. Add a test first to make the next changeset easier to understand. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4815
-
- Sep 26, 2018
-
-
Boris Feld authored
The `cleanupnodes` has logic to skip the creation of "prune" markers if the changeset is already obsolete. This feels strange and gets in the way of code changes to tracks folds. Now that callers no longer request such prune, we can drop this logic. In many cases, pruning through cleanupnodes should be replaced by internal phase usage.
-
- Sep 30, 2018
-
-
Matt Harbison authored
I couldn't figure out how to get the list to print without b'' with pycompat.write(), without converted each element to str.
-
Matt Harbison authored
I *think* this is the last of them.
-
Matt Harbison authored
With py3 on Windows, the prompt to accept changes in an --interactive run wasn't showing up until after the choice was read from stdin.
-
- Sep 29, 2018
-
-
Matt Harbison authored
-
Matt Harbison authored
-
Matt Harbison authored
-
- Sep 27, 2018
-
-
Boris Feld authored
If we already have some obsolete and hidden nodes locally and the server send them again to you, it seems useful to point it out instead of being silent about it.
-
Boris Feld authored
Changeset pulled from a remote repository while already obsolete locally can end up hidden after the pull. Hiding obsolete changesets is a good behavior but silently "skipping" some of the pulled content can get confusing. We now detect this situation and emit a message about it. The message is simple and the wording could be improved, however, we focus on the detection here. Evolution is still an experimental feature, so the output is open to changes. In particular, we could point out at the latest successors of the obsolete changesets, however, it can get tricky is there are many of them. So we delay these improvements to another adventure. Another easy improvement would be to merge this message with the previous line about the new nodes and their phases. This is a good example of cases where we can only transmit a limited amount of data to users by default. We need some sort of "transaction journal" we could point the user to.
-
Boris Feld authored
Obsolescence is closely related to visibility but still a distinct concept. We can receive changesets that are obsolete but visible (eg: when pulling orphans). Such changeset should be reported too. In addition, the filtering level can be anything, we should respect it.
-
Boris Feld authored
The current code ignores all obsolete changesets including the visible one. We add a test showing this behavior before fixing the behavior.
-
- Sep 26, 2018
-
-
Martin von Zweigbergk authored
We were doing repo['tip'].node() or similar in a few places where repo.changelog.tip() would be enough. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4781
-
- Sep 28, 2018
-
-
Matt Harbison authored
-
- Sep 20, 2018
-
-
Boris Feld authored
We use the new "duplicates" node tracking to find the tip of the bundle even if it already exists in the repository. Such logic is not supposed to be needed in theory. If the shelve was made using internal-phase, we already know its node. Otherwise, the bundle content should have been stripped. However, handling it makes the shelve code more robust and provide a good example of "revduplicates" usage.
-
- Sep 24, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
Parsing and writing of revision text metadata is likely identical across storage backends. Let's move the code out of revlog so we don't need to import the revlog module in order to use it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4754
-
Gregory Szorc authored
There will exist common code between storage backends. It would be nice to have a central place to put that code. This commit attempts to create that place by creating the "storageutil" module. The first thing we move is revlog.hash(), which is the function for computing the SHA-1 hash of revision fulltext and parents. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4753
-
Gregory Szorc authored
deltaparent() obtains the revision number of the base revision a delta in storage is stored against. It is highly revlog-centric and may not apply to other storage backends. As a result, it doesn't belong on the generic file storage interface. This method/proxy is no longer used in core. The last consumer was probably changegroup code and went away with the transition to emitrevisions(). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4751
-
Gregory Szorc authored
This method is no longer used by external consumers. The API is quite low-level and is effectively len(revision(raw=True)). I don't see a compelling reason to keep it around. Let's drop the API and make the file storage interface simpler. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4750
-
Gregory Szorc authored
Per-revision storage flags are kinda a revlog-centric API. (Except for the fact that changegroup uses the same integer flags as revlog does and there's minimal verification that the server's flags map to the client's storage flags - but that's another problem.) The last user of flags() was in verify.py and that code was just moved into revlog.py and is accessed behind the verifyintegrity() file storage API. Since there are no more consumers, let's drop the proxy and remove the method from the file storage interface. This commit only drops the dedicated API for reading a single revision's storage flags: we still support reading and writing flags through the bulk data retrieval and add revision APIs. And since changegroups encode revlog integer flags over the wire, we'll always need to support flags at some level. The removal of individual storage flags may be too premature. But since flags() is now unused, I'd like to see how far we can get without that dedicated API - especially since it uses revision numbers instead of nodes. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4746
-
- Sep 26, 2018
-
-
Martin von Zweigbergk authored
If the dirstate gets written much later (usually 1-2 s, depending on FS) than the working copy file (there's only one), then the `hg debugdirstate` command will include a timestamp. There's nothing wrong with that, so we should just allow it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4758
-
- Sep 24, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
With changegroup moving to emitrevisions(), this revlog-specific attribute is no longer used and can be deleted. Good riddance. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4727
-
Gregory Szorc authored
emitrevisions() is the future! Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4726
-
- Sep 21, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
The previous test was attempting to to test delta storage behavior. It didn't do a very good job at it because there was a good chance a delta wasn't being used in storage. Let's switch the test to yield a delta in storage so an upcoming change to delegate delta logic to storage has the desired effect. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4723
-
- Sep 24, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
This logic - including the experimental bundle.reorder option - was originally added in a8e3931e3fb5 in 2011 and then later ported to changegroup.py. The intent of this option and associated logic is to control the ordering of revisions in deltagroups in changegroups. At the time it was implemented, only changegroup version 1 existed and generaldelta revlogs were just coming into the world. Changegroup version 1 requires that deltas be made against the last revision sent over the wire. Used with generaldelta, this created an impedance mismatch of sorts and resulted in changegroup producers spending a lot of time recomputing deltas. Revision reordering was introduced so outgoing revisions would be sent in "generaldelta order" and producers would be able to reuse internal deltas from storage. Later on, we introduced changegroup version 2. It supported denoting which revision a delta was against. So we no longer needed to sort outgoing revisions to ensure optimal delta generation from the producer. So, subsequent changegroup versions disabled reordering. We also later made the changelog not store deltas by default. And we also made the changelog send out deltas in storage order. Why we do this for changelog, I'm not sure. Maybe we want to preserve revision order across clones? It doesn't really matter for this commit. Fast forward to 2018. We want to abstract storage backends. And having changegroup code require knowledge about how deltas are stored internally interferes with that goal. This commit removes reordering control from changegroup generation. After this commit, the reordering behavior is: * The changelog is always sent out in storage order (no behavior change). * Non-changelog generaldelta revlogs are reordered to always be in DAG topological order (previously, generaldelta revlogs would be emitted in storage order for version 2 and 3 changegroups). * Non-changelog non-generaldelta revlogs are sent in storage order (no behavior change). * There exists no config option to override behavior. The big difference here is that generaldelta revlogs now *always* have their revisions sorted in DAG order before going out over the wire. This behavior was previously only done for changegroup version 1. Version 2 and version 3 changegroups disabled reordering because the interchange format supported encoding arbitrary delta parents, so reordering wasn't strictly necessary. I can think of a few significant implications for this change. Because changegroup receivers will now see non-changelog revisions in DAG order instead of storage order, the internal storage order of manifests and files may differ substantially between producer and consumer. I don't think this matters that much, since the storage order of manifests and files is largely hidden from users. Only the storage order of changelog matters (because `hg log` shows the changelog in storage order). I don't think there should be any controversy here. The reordering of revisions has implications for changegroup producers. Previously, generaldelta revlogs would be emitted in storage order. And in the common case, the internally-stored delta could effectively be copied from disk into the deltagroup delta. This meant that emitting delta groups for generaldelta revlogs would be mostly linear read I/O. This is desirable for performance. With us now reordering generaldelta revlog revisions in DAG order, the read operations may use more random I/O instead of sequential I/O. This could result in performance loss. But with the prevalence of SSDs and fast random I/O, I'm not too worried. (Note: the optimal emission order for revlogs is actually delta encoding order. But the changegroup code wasn't doing that before or after this change. We could potentially implement that in a later commit.) Changegroups in DAG order will have implications for receivers. Previously, receiving storage order might mean seeing a number of interleaved branches. This would mean long delta chains, sparse I/O, and possibly more fulltext revisions instead of deltas, blowing up storage storage. (This is the same set of problems that sparse revlogs aims to address.) With the producer now sending revisions in DAG order, the receiver also stores revisions in DAG order. That means revisions for the same DAG branch are all grouped together. And this should yield better storage outcomes. In other words, sending the reordered changegroup allows the receiver to have better storage order and for the producer to not propagate its (possibly sub-optimal) internal storage order. On the mozilla-unified repository, this change influences bundle generation: $ hg bundle -t none-v2 -a before: time: real 355.680 secs (user 256.790+0.000 sys 16.820+0.000) after: time: real 382.950 secs (user 281.700+0.000 sys 17.690+0.000) before: 7,150,228,967 bytes (uncompressed) after: 7,041,556,273 bytes (uncompressed) before: 1,669,063,234 bytes (zstd l=3) after: 1,628,598,830 bytes (zstd l=3) $ hg unbundle before: time: real 511.910 secs (user 466.750+0.000 sys 32.680+0.000) after: time: real 487.790 secs (user 443.940+0.000 sys 30.840+0.000) 00manifest.d size: source: 274,924,292 bytes before: 304,741,626 bytes after: 245,252,087 bytes .hg/store total file size: source: 2,649,133,490 before: 2,680,888,130 after: 2,627,875,673 We see the bundle size drop. That's probably because if a revlog internally isn't storing a delta, it will choose to delta against the last emitted revision. And on repos with interleaved branches (like mozilla-unified), the previous revision could be an unrelated branch and therefore be a large delta. But with this patch, the previous revision is likely p1 or p2 and a delta should be small. We also see the manifest size drop by ~50 MB. It's worth noting that the manifest actually *increased* in size by ~25 MB in the old strategy and decreased ~25 MB from its source in the new strategy. Again, my explanation for this is that the DAG ordering in the changegroup is resulting in better grouping of revisions in the receiver, which results in more compact delta chains and higher storage efficiency. Unbundle time also dropped. I suspect this is due to the revlog having to work less to compute deltas since the incoming deltas are more optimal. i.e. the receiver spends less time resolving fulltext revisions as incoming deltas bounce around between DAG branches and delta chains. We also see bundle generation time increase. This is not desirable. However, the regression is only significant on the original repository: if we generate a bundle from the repository created from the new, always reordered bundles, we're close to baseline (if not at it with expected noise): $ hg bundle -t none-v2 -a before (original): time: real 355.680 secs (user 256.790+0.000 sys 16.820+0.000) after (original): time: real 382.950 secs (user 281.700+0.000 sys 17.690+0.000) after (new repo): time: real 362.280 secs (user 260.300+0.000 sys 17.700+0.000) This regression is a bit worrying because it will impact serving canonical repositories (that don't have optimal internal storage unless they are reordered - possibly as part of running `hg debugupgraderepo`). However, this regression will only be noticed by very large changegroups. And I'm guessing/hoping that any repository that large is using clonebundles to mitigate server load. Again, sending DAG order isn't the optimal send order for servers: sending in storage-delta order is. But in order to enable storage-optimal send order, we'll need a storage API that handles sorting. Future commits will introduce such an API. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4721
-
- Sep 21, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
The previous commit removed the last consumer of the "index" attribute on the file storage interface. The index is an extremely low-level data structure that is revlog specific and isn't appropriate to expose as part of a generic storage API. There may be a market for an efficient data structure to obtain metadata on every revision for a file. But if there is, it should be designed using e.g. named attributes for lookup instead of a list-like of 8-tuples. Let's drop the attribute from filelog and remove the attribute from the file storage interface. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4720
-
- Sep 24, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
upgrade.py is the only consumer of filelog.index, which I'd like to eliminate from the file storage interface. This commit changes the upgrade code to report the storage size of files by looking at the size of the files backing its storage instead of looking at the index. I'm not convinced the approach in this patch will live very long because it is relying on low-level attributes like "opener" and "files," which may behave very differently on non-revlog storage. But the data is only used for reporting purposes and it does get us one step closer to eliminating "index." A side-effect of this change is we now report the size of the revlog index data - not just the revision data. I think this is more accurate. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4717
-
- Sep 21, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
LFS is monkeypatching filelog.filelog and is then accessing various filelog attributes in the monkeypatched function. This is all fine. But some of the attributes being accessed by LFS are revlog centric and shouldn't be exposed on the file storage interface. This commit changes the monkeypatched functions to access proxied attributes on self._revlog instead of self. This should be safe to do because non-revlog repositories should not be using filelog instances: instead they should have a separate class to represent file storage. So it is reasonable for LFS to assume the _revlog attribute exists and points to a revlog. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4714
-
- Sep 20, 2018
-
-
Gregory Szorc authored
This is very similar to what we just did for LFS but for largefiles. See recent commit messages for the rationale here. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4713
-