<p>This is a proposal to provide a fully compatible working <aclass="reference external"href="http://numpy.scipy.org/">NumPy</a> implementation
for PyPy. This has long been a very commonly <aclass="reference external"href="http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/06/report-back-from-our-survey.html">requested feature</a> for PyPy
as well as a worthy goal given that PyPy performs extremely well on numeric
workloads.</p>
...
...
@@ -59,8 +60,8 @@
<p>This is a proposal to provide a fully compatible working <aclass="reference external"href="http://numpy.scipy.org/">NumPy</a> implementation
for PyPy. This has long been a very commonly <aclass="reference external"href="http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/06/report-back-from-our-survey.html">requested feature</a> for PyPy
as well as a worthy goal given that PyPy performs extremely well on numeric
workloads.</p>
<p>We already had some success providing a very basic NumPy implementation,
<p>We already had some success providing a very basic <aclass="reference external"href="http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/05/numpy-in-pypy-status-and-roadmap.html">NumPy implementation</a>,
however we believe that raising funds can significantly speed up its
development, by paying people to work full time on it.</p>
<p>Below you'll find the <aclass="reference internal"href="#work-plan">work plan</a> and the associated